Expert Review Team June Working
Session:
English and Science College Readiness Project
From
June 26-28, over 100 educators and College Readiness Project supporters
made their way to the picturesque waterfront town of Edmonds Washington
and the Edmonds
Conference Center. In this English and Science Review Team Working
Session, participants had the opportunity to engage in rich cross-sector
discussions around the most recent draft of the definitions while
exploring other state and national efforts in this area.
The event represented a broad, cross-sector effort
to bring the collective wisdom of a diverse group of Washington educators
to bear on the draft English and science definitions with the aim
of improving and strengthening the work to date. Their brief charge
for the next two days would be to review the definitions and make
recommendations for additions, deletions and changes.
To help support the participants’ work
in this endeavor, state and national
experts were on hand throughout the duration of the session to
support the vital work this group had taken on. In addition, members
of the project
content team, who help oversee the project, their perspectives
to the discussions.
Facilitator, Terryll Bailey of The
Allison Group
presented the agenda and set forth the overriding Project goal of
the Review Team Meeting:
“Define
what students need to know and be able to do to successfully
perform entry-level college (2- or 4-year)
coursework in English and Science” |
To view Terryll’s PowerPoint presentation,
click
here.
In a kick-off address that first morning, HECB
Associate Director for P-16, Academic Affairs, Ricardo Sanchez provided
an overview of the project’s
history (PowerPoint), guiding
principles and work to date. He then introduced Washington State Senator
Rosemary McAuliffe, who offered her support and encouragement.
Darya Veach of the Educational
Policy Improvement Center, explained the function of the online
tool that has facilitated the dynamic exchange of information among
the developers of the definitions draft.
John House, Program Coordinator of the Washington
State Transition
Mathematics Project and member of the HECB College Readiness Project
Management Team, presented his insider’s perspective of the
TMP’s existing work on college readiness in mathematics, which
helped pave the way for the English and science project.
Armed
with an overview of the project, the cross-sector review teams discussed
the proposed college readiness definitions and their relationship
to existing K-12’ Grade
Level Expectations (GLE’s) and Essential Academic Learning Requirements
(EALRs). What followed was an active, focused, sometimes frustrating,
sometimes enlightening and intense, exchange of ideas that resulted
in a number of important and viable suggestions regarding the draft
definitions. The input from the two-day review will be compiled and
will inform future discussions by content teams that developed the
draft definitions Final draft definitions are scheduled to be delivered
to the Higher Education Board in December 2006.
“I
hadn’t been aware of the specific GLEs and EALRs.
That was very useful to know, and gave me a better understanding
of what HS and junior HS teachers do.”
- quote
from a community/technical college attendee
“I didn’t
come in with specific expectations,… however, I have
enjoyed talking with 2-year/4-year educators because it has
shown me that what I have been doing in my classroom is relevant
to college readiness, I also have identified weaknesses within
my curriculum that I plan on working on for next year. These
connections were so valuable!”
- quote from
a K-12 attendee
|
Click
here for a PowerPoint photo slide show of the two-day expert review
team working session.
For more information about the college readiness
initiatives underway in Washington State, go to: http://www.learningconnections.org/clc/hecb.htm
Contributing insights into this work and the
concepts of college readiness, David Conley delivered a presentation
entitled, “Overview
of Process and Issues Related to Developing College Readiness Definitions.”
(PowerPoint)
Almost
to a person, the intention to share and use these definitions to rework,
integrate or newly implement them into their own curricula was expressed.
“The
dialogue was great! Thanks for the opportunity – I gained
still more respect for my colleagues across the state.”
- quote from a community/technical
college attendee
|
In a letter of appreciation to the review team
members, Ricardo Sanchez writes:
“We
appreciate the professionalism, experience and unique perspectives
that you brought to the process, as well as the quality and
quantity of input and feedback you provided. Your contributions
bring us an important step closer to developing college readiness
definitions in Washington State that we anticipate will be useful
for generations to come.” |
< back